Re: Heathrow pilot 'refused to land'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fair enough. If the PIC has concerns then a landing should not be attempted.

David


On Tuesday 30 July 2002 4:20 pm, Roger & Amanda La France wrote:

>
> Heathrow pilot 'refused to land'
>
>  Planes at Heathrow
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38153000/jpg/_38153344_plane.300.jpg
>
> Heathrow is the UK's largest airport
>
> Aviation safety officials have begun investigating claims a pilot
> refused to land on the only open runway at Heathrow because its radar
> was out of order.
>
> The pilot of a Qantas Boeing 747 coming from Singapore surprised air
> traffic controllers by approaching the airport at 0400BST on Saturday -
> almost an hour early, according to the Guardian newspaper.
>
>
> Heathrow's southerly runway was still closed for overnight maintenance
> leaving the only available runway in the north of the airport.
>
>
> But the pilot told controllers that, with the runway's electronic
> guidance system being replaced, he was not prepared to risk a manual
> landing due to too much cloud
>
>
> Back-log
>
>
> The pilot also turned down an offer to land from the other end of the
> runway as there were insufficient approach lights.
>
>
> The paper claims that, in the end, airport staff had to rush to reopen
> the main southerly runway, moving vehicles off the tarmac and sweeping
> the surface.
>
>
> By the time the jet landed, at 0450, a queue of other long-haul aircraft
> had banked up behind it.
>
>
> A CAA spokesman said: "I can confirm that we are examining this incident
> but it looks at this stage as if there are no safety issues. That is our
> conclusion at the moment."
>
>

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]