Walter, The other way. IATA matches ICAO..... ICAO around long before any one thought of IATA. Al ----- Original Message ----- From: "W Wilson" <wlw-jr@att.net> To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: Re: Dallas Morning News: Airport Codes > LOL...The FCC doesn't extend to Japan. Also the codes would fall more > inline with the ICAO representations. Which as we know, 99% of the the US > (mainland) ICAO codes match the IATA codes (-) the K prefix. Also during > the previous discussion, there are some airports that do have the ICAO "K" > prefix then a "W" following: > KWYS, KWWD, KWVI, KWST, KWRB, KWMC, KWHP, KWDG, KWBW. Their is only one > airport with a "K", and that is KKLS, These are are no K "Q" airports. > (Credit given to the Garmin 400 series training CD). > > Walter > DCA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Mueller" <kawika42@mac.com> > To: <AIRLINE@LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 06:00 > Subject: Re: Dallas Morning News: Airport Codes > > > > On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 03:26 AM, clay.wardlow@adic.com wrote: > > > > > The Federal Communications Commission set aside the "W" and "K" codes > > > for > > > radio stations, and "Q" was designated for international > > > telecommunications. > > > > Well K has been used by airports... KOA (Kona International Airport at > > Keahole) and KIX (Osaka - Kansai International) come to mind off the top > > of my head. > > > > -- > > David Mueller / HNL > > kawika42@mac.com > > http://www.quanterium.com > > > > *** Read the Airline List FAQ at http://airlinefaq.tripod.com *** > > >