""The D.C. controllers are absolutely horrible. Washington National is absolutely the worst place to fly into, period," said Happy Wells, a 30-year veteran pilot from Oklahoma who was cited in July 1997 for flying his charter plane through Washington's prohibited zone. " This guy needs to get a grip and read his instructions. A simple review of the departure procedures and/or approach plates would have probably offset his predicament of venturing into P-56. The rest of the report is pretty good summary of what the punishment used to be.... .....and BAHA..don't read the last couple sentences. Your favorite lady is mentioned. Walter DCA By FRANK BASS and JOHN SOLOMON WASHINGTON (AP) - Pilots have flown through the prohibited airspace protecting the White House at least 94 times over the past decade, illustrating the challenges of thwarting a terrorist airstrike on the nation's capital. Even with military jets patrolling the skies, four commercial airliners and a medical helicopter have crossed into Washington's no-fly zone since the Sept. 11 suicide hijackings, Federal Aviation Administration officials say. The latest was on Monday. In most cases, pilots who violated the airspace protecting the White House, vice presidential mansion and Capitol have gotten penalties less severe than a parking ticket, an Associated Press review of FAA enforcement records found. Just a month before the September hijackings, a Mesa Airlines flight strayed into prohibited airspace. By November, the matter was closed with a warning letter to the pilot - common for most cases. Security experts say violations of the Washington airspace highlight a key reality in the fight against terrorism - planes that veer into the zone can crash into government installations within seconds. "Practically speaking, by the time a violation is discovered, it is too late to do anything to prevent a crash into the White House," former FAA security chief Billie H. Vincent said. FAA Deputy Administrator Monte R. Belger said Thursday the agency recognizes there's little time to react once planes penetrate the safety zone and so the government has imposed numerous other precautions to ensure planes with ill intent don't get close. "The restricted area is kind of the last line of defense," Belger said. "The additional on-the-ground security procedures and in-flight protocols put in place give us a much higher level of confidence." Borders have been tightened; pilots, flight crews and passengers are screened to weed out possible terrorists, and planes approaching Washington must complete authentication procedures, including providing passwords. About three dozen planes approaching Reagan National Airport have been turned away since Sept. 11 because they didn't complete the verification process, officials said. Planes that violate the prohibited zone are quickly warned by the flight tower to correct course, and the Secret Service is alerted. Nearly all pilots comply immediately, officials said. Military planes that patrol the capital skies are permitted to force such planes to land or, as a last resort, shoot them down if pilots don't respond. None of the five planes that flew into the protected space since Sept. 11 have required such action, officials said. In an announcement last fall about improved protection of Washington's airspace, the FAA said pilots who infringed the no-fly zone faced "suspension or revocation of their licenses or a fine." But FAA's enforcement database, obtained by AP under the Freedom of Information Act, shows nearly all the violators since 1992 have gotten just a warning letter. Of the 111 pilots on the 94 flights, just one was fined, for $1,000, and nine had their licenses suspended for between seven to 120 days. At least 90 cases were settled by administrative action, mostly warning or correction letters, the records show. Four violating pilots had their penalties reversed later. Reagan National was closed for more than a month after the attacks, and has been gradually reopened to traffic since despite reservations by the Secret Service. One pilot died when he crashed his small plane into the White House in the mid-1990s; no one else was harmed. In 1999, a pilot drifted so close to the White House that agents fired a warning flare. That pilot ended up with a warning letter, FAA records say. "Air security is certainly something we deal with on a daily basis, both with being in constant communication with tower at Reagan and with the FAA," Secret Service spokesman James Mackin said. The five most recent airspace violations are still being investigated, including a Frontier Airlines 737 jet that flew over the White House and vice presidential residence on Monday before correcting its path. That pilot has been grounded with pay. American Airlines has had two jets fly into the zone since Sept. 11, US Airways has had one and the fifth incident involved a medical transport helicopter. FAA records show violators over the past decade include about three dozen pilots for major commercial airlines, one Air Force pilot, one NASA pilot, a handful of private or foreign pilots and several air transport companies. American Airlines topped the list of commercial airlines with at least eight pilots cited. US Airways had seven, Continental four and three each from Delta, Northwest and America West. One pilot caught in the airspace blamed air traffic controllers, saying they are so busy they sometimes order flight maneuvers that send pilots into the prohibited zone. "The D.C. controllers are absolutely horrible. Washington National is absolutely the worst place to fly into, period," said Happy Wells, a 30-year veteran pilot from Oklahoma who was cited in July 1997 for flying his charter plane through Washington's prohibited zone. Wells said his proposed penalty was rescinded after he filed a report with the FAA. The air traffic controllers union defended the work of their Washington employees. "Pilots have consistently reinforced the opinion that National has some of the best controllers in the air traffic control system," spokesman Doug Church said. Operators of Reagan National said the violations aren't necessarily a sign of lax security. Pilots can be knocked off course by something as simple as heavy wind. FAA says it has settled most cases with warning letters because it believes pilots were operating in good faith at an airport considered one of the toughest to navigate. Former U.S. Transportation Department Inspector General Mary Schiavo, who highlighted airline safety problems in the 1990s and now works as a lawyer representing airline accident victims, said the small number of suspensions is a sign of laissez-faire enforcement. "It is fairly typical. The FAA really doesn't like to do enforcement actions, particularly any carrier infringement," Schiavo said.