NYTimes.com Article: American and British Air Reject Government Terms for Alliance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by psa188@juno.com.


/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\


Share the spirit with a gift from Starbucks.
Our coffee brewers & espresso machines at
special holiday prices.
http://www.starbucks.com/shop/subcategory.asp?category_name=Sale/Clearance&ci=274&cookie_test=1

\----------------------------------------------------------/


American and British Air Reject Government Terms for Alliance

January 25, 2002

By LAURENCE ZUCKERMAN




American Airlines and British Airways (news/quote) rejected
conditions proposed by Washington today that would have
given the two carriers the right to merge their operations
across the Atlantic.

The announcement by the two airlines effectively ends their
second bid since 1996 to win regulatory approval for their
alliance, and it is a major setback for consumers because
it dashes any hope that London and Washington will soon
negotiate a new, liberalized air services treaty that would
grant United States carriers greater access to London's
Heathrow Airport.

British negotiators were scheduled to begin talks on a new
air treaty in Washington on Monday but they canceled the
meeting today, the State Department confirmed. Whether any
new agreement will ever be reached is now in doubt because
the European Court of Justice is expected to rule in the
next few months on a case that challenges the right of
European Union members to negotiate bilateral air
agreements.

The current treaty between London and Washington is one of
the most restrictive in the world. Only two domestic
airlines, American and United Airlines, are allowed to fly
between Heathrow and the United States.

Regulatory approval of the application for exemption from
antitrust laws by American and British Airways would have
opened up Heathrow to four additional American carriers.
But the Transportation Department demanded that American
and British Airways make 224 weekly takeoffs and landings
at Heathrow available to the new competitors.

That was not acceptable to the two carriers.

"We made it
clear from the start that we would not conclude the deal if
the regulatory price was too high," Rod Eddington, the
chief executive of British Airways, and Donald J. Carty,
the chief executive of American, said in a joint statement.
"We will not acquiesce to unrealistic, and in our view,
unnecessary demands."

The rejection came only hours after the Transportation
Department released a 64-page order outlining its terms.
This was the culmination of an expensive lobbying campaign
in which competing airlines pushed regulators to extract as
many concessions as possible from American and British
Airways.

The result, after millions of dollars was spent by both
sides, is that nothing will change. British Airways will
continue to dominate Heathrow but it will not be able to
coordinate pricing and scheduling with American as other
competing airline alliances now do.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/25/business/25CND-AIR.html?ex=1013019790&ei=1&en=bc591f61961bf361



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

[Index of Archives]         [NTSB]     [NASA KSC]     [Yosemite]     [Steve's Art]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [NTSB]     [STB]     [Share Photos]     [Yosemite Campsites]