Re: aclocal's past and future home (was Re: Best practise for aclocal paths in cross builds)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 Dec 2024, at 18:23, Zack Weinberg <zack@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The other thing that comes to mind is, if there were anyone working
> seriously on usage of autoconf *without* automake, that would make
> the move a lot more valuable.  I know some people have tried that in
> the past but I don't think any of them ever got anywhere.

There’s definitely a non-zero number of projects in real use that use autoconf but not automake, so moving it does seems like a reasonable thing to do.

Ross
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux