Hello Mike, Am 23.06.2016 um 07:19 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On 22 Jun 2016 22:52, Olaf Mandel wrote: >> On 22.06.2016 21:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: -Snipp- >>> wouldn't you want the test itself to spin up/down the server as need >>> be ? that way you can write multiple end-to-end tests and have them >>> all run in parallel. >>> >> You mean my "client" program starting the server itself? [...] >> I will have to try if >> this gives suitable debugging information (I am mostly interested in >> memory debugging the real server, not the client that was only written >> for testing). >> I finally got it working exactly as I want: thank you for the solution. >>> i'm guessing your method described above also doesn't work when you >>> try to run all the tests in parallel. -Snipp- > > probing for an open port would be one way to handle it. if you can > conditionally rely on Linux namespace features, you could create a > new network namespace for each test which would give you a completely > blank slate with localhost available. > $ unshare -Urn -Snipp- Decided not to do that because I didn't need the parallel testing on one machine and because my default user does not have the required permissions. But now that I learned of this I will keep it in mind should the need arise: thanks for pointing it out. Best regards, Olaf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
