On 4/12/2016 11:24 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > > Also, checking for <stdio.h> is pointless these days. You can portably > assume a C89 compiler (and these days, often a C99 compiler), which > guarantees <stdio.h> is present. > But removing that check would thwart the purpose of autoconf being able to provide legacy support, would it not? I suppose there comes a point in time when legacy needs a maximum age but I think that requires some acknowledgement from the users of autoconf. -- Earnie _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
