> On 01/05/2015 10:30 AM, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
> >> On 01/05/2015 03:08 AM, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
> >>> Autotools defaults to the 'v7' legacy tar format in GNU tar, through
> >> passing of the '-o' parameter to GNU tar. Enabling this option results
> in
> >> errors for users with 32 bit UIDs. For example, with the Open vSwitch
> >> package:
> >>
> >> 'make dist' is under the purview of automake, not autoconf. You may get
> >> a better response by involving the automake list.
> >
> > Sorry - I find the line between the two to be rather blurred at the best
> of times :) Should I forward this or CC this list?
>
> I've added the automake list in cc (I'm interested enough in the outcome
> that I don't mind if the autoconf list remains in the distribution).
>
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> $ make dist
> >>> ...
> >>> tardir=openvswitch-2.3.90 && ${TAR-tar} chof - "$tardir" | GZIP=--
> >> best gzip -c >openvswitch-2.3.90.tar.gz
> >>> tar: value 12345678 out of uid_t range 0..2097151
> >>> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
> >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/development/ovs'
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> I managed to modify the Autoconf 'configure.ac' file to use the 'tar-
> >> ustar' format, which allow longer file names and other niceties. Again,
> >> with the Open vSwitch package:
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> >>> index ebb8b02..6505189 100644
> >>> --- a/configure.ac
> >>> +++ b/configure.ac
> >>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
> >>> AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])
> >>> AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
> >>> AC_CONFIG_TESTDIR([tests])
> >>> -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
> >>> +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([tar-ustar])
> >>
> >> Are you proposing that we change the way autoconf is distributed? That
> >> won't affect any other packages (you'd have to make the same patch for
> >> each affected package), and so far, your code shows that you had
> >> problems in building an openvswitch tarball, not an autoconf tarball.
> >> Again, changing automake to do this automatically for ALL packages (once
> >> those packages are built with a new enough automake) rather than trying
> >> to patch one configure.ac for every affected package, seems like it
> >> would be the better course of action.
> >>
> >> I'm still open to be convinced that autoconf needs to alter its own
> >> configure.ac, but I don't have enough evidence yet that it would make a
> >> difference.
> >
> > Not necessarily. The use of the 'v7' format means any users with a 32 bit
> UID will need to modify every 'configure.ac' file they come across to fix
> the above issue. However, it's not like I personally work with enough
> packages to make this much of an issue. Instead, an approach that would
> allow me to enable the 'tar-ustar' format dynamically (like the 'configure'
> option above) would be just fine, if such a thing exists. This would allow
> me (and all 32bit UID users) to adopt a standard approach to working with
> Autotools based packages (i.e. always pass an option to the 'configure'
> script of any Autotools-based package).
> >
> > Changing the default tar format used by Autotools would result in a
> permanent fix for all affected users, as you say (affected users = the
> other developers in my team in Intel, for example). However, I don't know
> if this would cause compatibility issues on certain (very, very old)
> machines. You could see a scenario whereby the 'make dist' target of
> (previously working) autogenerated-Makefiles files would break when
> Autotools is updated, due to the ustar format not being supported. I have
> no data on tar ustar support, I'm afraid.
>
> As for whether the upstream automake should make it easier for runtime
> overrides of the format, or even dynamic changes, I am not sure. I also
> know that some packages (particularly those using gnulib's GNUmakefile)
> explicitly set:
>
> export TAR_OPTIONS = --owner=0 --group=0 --numeric-owner
>
> to try and avoid the problem of a 32-bit uid interfering with the
> creation of old-style tar files. Maybe that is an approach that should
> be folded into automake?
Ah, so there isn't currently a dynamic way to do this that you're aware of? This was my original question, such that this patch could be merged to OVS:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-December/049819.html
It is interesting to see an alternative approach to resolving the issue. That approach would prevent the need to change the default format to ustar, though there are other benefits to using the ustar format:
https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/wiki/ManPageTar5
>
> >
> > I will attempt to reproduce this issue on other Autotools-based packages
> and report my findings.
> >
>
> Not sure that your additional testing will change anything - again, the
> issue here is that automake would be the one place to change for
> everyone else to automatically benefit from, once packages are rebuilt
> with newer automake.
>
Understood. Guess we should wait for Automake folks to get back to us so.
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
