On 8 September 2014 23:51, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08 Sep 2014, at 22:30 , Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 8 September 2014 22:34, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Down Under there are mammals who got pretty good at imitating duck features lately. >> >> That's exactly the reason for autoconf-way: >> […] > > OK, before this duck thing gets a bit out of hand, back to a more day-to-day-like problem: > I'm ginving theoretical autoconf-way answer. I admit that in some individual cases the Right Thing(tm) might be too much work in practice, and the "check version number" hack is justifiable. > I would need to test whether the compiler accepts “-OMG” Test if compiler accepts "-OMG" > AND > I would need a way to test whether the compiler is specifically GCC (not clang, not icc) between 3.2.0 and 3.4.2 > > as I would need to disable -OMG on GCC version 3.2.0 to 3.4.2 because of user report of miscompilations and/or buggy code there. Test if compiler miscompiles with "-OMG" - ML _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
