Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/08/14 18:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:25:38 -0700
>> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Autoconf <Autoconf@xxxxxxx>, Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>> 	bug-make <bug-make@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> As far as Windows goes, NTFS file systems have 100 ns resolution, and 
>> FAT file systems are the joker as they have a 2-second resolution for 
>> last-modified time.
> 
> That's true, but FAT filesystems are hardly important these days.

Except insofar as they tend to be prevalent on removable media devices,
such as USB flash drives; woe betide anyone who happens to store their
working files on one of those.

-- 
Regards,
Keith.

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux