Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/08/14 16:18, Paul Smith wrote:
> Can't we just #define stat(_p,_b) _stat(_p,_b)?  Not sure if that's
> sufficient: I'm not overly familiar with the limitations on the POSIX
> emulation functions in Windows.

That's effectively what MinGW does anyway, (although it does it through
an import library mapping from the undecorated POSIX name, to the
decorated name exported by MSVCRT.DLL).  The upshot is that, when you
call stat() in a Windows program compiled by MinGW's GCC, you actually
call the function provided by Microsoft themselves, with whatever
limitations that imposes.

-- 
Regards,
Keith.

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux