Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ray Donnelly wrote:
There was a bug in libfaketime so that the nanosecond field wasn't
cleared

That sounds like it's a different issue. If a program botches the nanosecond component of timestamps, it shouldn't matter whether 'make' uses the traditional/GNU or the HP-UX approach; either way, you can get into trouble.

If I'm misunderstanding the libfaketime issue, could you please explain it with an example?

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux