On 2014.02.07 at 08:44 +0100, Thomas Jahns wrote: > On Feb 6, 2014, at 22:00 , Russ Allbery wrote: > > Why would one not instead build the object and then use objdump on > > it to > > look at the exported symbols? It's still not ideally portable, but it > > seems like it should be more portable than trying to grep the assembly > > output. > > > could perhaps even nm solve that? Then using libtool, which tries to > find a BSD nm if available, would perhaps suffice. That could work if you look for symbols that change e.g. from 'W' to 't' with -fvisibility=hidden. With -flto you will need binutils that use the linker-plugin by default, but that's yet another issue. -- Markus _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
