Re: implement workaround for header files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/08/2013 01:35 AM, Daily, Jeff A wrote:
Peter,

I'm not an experienced boost user, but I am aware that much of boost is header-only libraries.  And it sounds like from your description above that your library installs headers which also include this potentially broken header<boost/exception_ptr.hpp>.  The community would need to chime in here, but for my projects I don't install the generated config.h or a subset public_config.h like you have done, but since you already have that capability it would probably be little effort for you to extend public_config.h with an AC_DEFINE of the result of your test and then include your public_config.h from the top of your installed headers.
Hi Jeff,

Thanks for your input. Yes, I think I prefer to implement a compilation test rather than try to set up some rules based on GCC versions and Boost version (although I'm pretty sure problem only occurs for Boost v1.41). Yet working out which versions of GCC are problematic seems tedious.

Thanks,
Peter

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf




[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux