On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 03:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > people who do binary releases often times find an old distro that works and > then upgrade packages as need be. then they keep that image around forever. > > either that or they just do a build for the last two RHEL or Ubuntu releases > and say "compatible with these two distros and we don't care about the rest". Tedious, but makes sense. > do what every one else does. release a .deb for Ubuntu that depends on the > right packages. or open source it :P. done. It's already GPL'd <http://rod.gs/A2m>. As for debs, I'd love to, but for the reasons I mentioned, it's not possible. =) -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred http://www.thevertigo.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
