On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:57 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > What you're thinking of is -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic — for the GNU > linker at least, but this is not portable. > > Seriously, it sounds to me like something else is wrong, you should never > have the need to statically link stuff that way unless you're doing release > management of binary applications, in which case you have another set of > problems entirely. Hey Diego. Sorry, I'm confused. Are you referring to my need to statically link against certain libraries, or Robert's suggested approach? -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred http://www.thevertigo.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf