Re: [RFC] getting rid of the config.guess/sub problem when bootstrapping new ports/systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I suggested a simple, low impact way of updating the files,
particularly for people wanting to build a large number of packages
(eg, for a distro). Can anyone tell me why this approach is not
satisfactory?

Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux