On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ben Elliston wrote: > > First, this does not solve the problem because it requires that every > package get a new version of config.guess. We're trying to overcome > having to modify every package. So that's your objection to the symlink/copy idea as well? > Second, I don't like the idea of doing things that surprise users. That will > confuse people. It also causes recursiveness so the idea is lame unless we also trap the recursive nature to one instance. I don't think it is that confusing but perhaps --with-config-dir=/path/to/config files might be nice and configure would execute the config.guess and config.sub in that directory or error if the files do not exist or are unreadable. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
