On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 09:11 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/20/2013 09:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 08:37 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > > >> I would MUCH rather see us honor a CONFIG_GUESS and CONFIG_SUB > >> environment variable, rather than baking in a PATH search. This topic > >> has come up in the past, where I made the same request back then. > > > > The patch does both and both are needed AFAICT. > > I disagree. Env-var override should be sufficient, without needing any > PATH probing. FWIW I agree with Eric. Having behind-the-scenes path probing for local overrides is, IMO, asking for a lot of trouble. It's far to easy to drop a file on your system and forget about it it, leading to much confusion and frustration a few months/years later. Also consider the support burden... I just don't see the need for it. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
