On Tuesday 2013-02-12 12:19, Yann Droneaud wrote: >Le mardi 05 février 2013 à 19:15 +0100, Jan Engelhardt a écrit : >> On Sunday 2013-02-03 10:49, Yann Droneaud wrote: >> > >> >So to create a "valid" --build argument, I was going to use >> >--build=`uname -p`-`uname -s` but its producing 'x86_64-Linux' which is >> >not recognized by config.sub. >> >> --build/--host/--target is not supposed to be fed any names besides those >> in the config.sub "dictionary". Toolchain names that do not follow suit >> are not usable, and that currently includes, for example, x32 support. > >Thank you for this clarification. I haven't found such claim in the >documentation Look at it from the paranoid angle: there is no claim to the contrary in the documentation either. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
