On 12/16/2012 07:06 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Why not just use ulimit to not dump core? Or is that a bashism and not a shism?
The ulimit approach seems useful.
Yes, that would be nice to add, if someone writes
a patch. I doubt whether it'd work everywhere, though.
Instead they write a core file with some other file name
Autoconf-generated 'configure' scripts remove the commonly-used
file names for core files.
or even write all core files to some other directory on the system.
It doesn't catch those.
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
