Re: Selecting a C++ standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
>> * Andrew W. Nosenko:
>>
>>> ABI break by gcc-4.7.0 and 4.7.1 in c++11 mode was a bug (or
>>> misfeature, call it as you want).  Fixed in gcc-4.7.2.
>>> From http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html :
>>
>> I've seen similar issues with GCC 4.7.2.  I thought that this was
>> expected, so I didn't report it as a bug.
>
> I've since checked, and it was was with 4.7.1.
>
> Linking C++98 and C++11 code together is still officially unsupported,
> even if it is supposed to work if you just use libstdc++.  So I think
> it's wrong to automatically default to C++11 when available.

Why?  IMHO more reasonable to just blacklist the gcc-4.7.0 and 4.7.1.

-- 
Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux