Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Real "buildable by C89 or later" is rarely used, since due to lack of > long long you have no guaranteed 64bit integer type in C89. Almost none of the software that I work on requires a 64-bit integer type. (C89 or later is also my default target for the software I write.) -- Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
