On 08/28/2012 12:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > A serious question: is there any C++ compiler out there which defines > _Bool by default (without including stdbool.h) I don't know of any offhand (remember, I don't use C++...) but it seems quite likely that there would be, no? It would be a valid extension to C++, and it would let a C++ compile more C code without awkward fiddling. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
