Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > No idea. The working priciples of standard autoconf checks are based on > evaluating compiler errors only and to ignore warnings[1], therefore -Wall > -Wextra must not desturb "by definition". > However, adding -Werror to CFLAGS is dangerous, because this will raise > GCC warnings to errors, which will cause autoconf to become confused and > to produce bogus results. > Ralf > [1] There exist (non-standard) autoconf checks which are based on > evaluating compiler warnings. If properly written, these also should not > be affected by "-Wall -Wextra", ... if they are, these checks need to be > considered broken ;) I've clearly just misremembered, then. Apologies for the noise. -- Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
