Re: AC_C_NORETURN macro?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-04-29 09:56:03 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 04/29/2012 08:34 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >I don't like the fact that you assume by default that compilers
> >are non-conforming
> 
> Nor do I.  How about the following improvement to the heuristic?
> It is just a heuristic so we can't do a perfect job, but the
> following should be better than what we have now:
[...]

Yes, this is better, IMHO. The main problem is that partial C11
implementations that support _Noreturn but not other mandatory
C11 features may not have __STDC_VERSION__ defined to 201112.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf



[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux