On 2012-04-29 16:11:38 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: > > it might make sense to try to do it in a more Autoconfish way. > > The reason why we do this with explicit #ifs that test for a compiler > brand, not in an "Autoconfish way", is that we use the result in .h > files that should be installable and, after installation, used by a > potentially different compiler. Simon's and my packages use this feature. > The best way to get this done correctly are cascades of explicit #ifs. But there is a risk of clash if some application uses some library with this gnulib feature and another library with different conventions. I think that an installable <stdnoreturn.h> should be done globally at the system level. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf