On Friday 02 March 2012 11:09:13 Olaf Lenz wrote: > On 03/02/2012 05:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > > The Autoconf team is considering releasing only .xz files for 2.69; > > if this would be a hardship for you, and you need the .gz or .bz2 > > release, please speak up now. > > I want to second Bob Friesenhahn's opinion that it would be nice to keep > at least a .gz release version. The xz-utils are not part of all > standard distributions yet (I can just name the current Sabayon Linux > and openSUSE 11.3), so I would prefer it if a standard tool like autoconf > would not depend on it. uhh, Sabayon does have xz-utils and has for quite a long time now. after all, it's simply Gentoo at its core, and Gentoo has had xz-utils for a long time. openSUSE has had xz-utils since 11.2. before that, they had lzma-utils. so do you have any other distros to list ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
