Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2012 10:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried to test how much peak memory 'xz' uses to decompress the
>>> autoconf tarball but was (apparently) defeated by the strange way
>>> that 'xz' is linked. I will try again with a different tool this
>>> weekend.
>>
>> Ok, I have now measured how much memory the 'xz' I have here requires
>> under Linux to decompress the autoconf beta tarball.  It requires
>> 67,184,168 bytes of heap memory.  This seems to match the xz
>> documentation for the -9 compression level.
> 
> The autoconf tarball is not large enough to warrant using xz's -9 option.
> A simple xz -e (i.e., use the default of -6) should be fine.

What's the magic to add to cfg.mk to get that change in default?  I just
used gnulib's maint.mk 'make beta' to make the 2.68b tarball, so if the
defaults are wrong in maint.mk, maybe we should be fixing things
upstream from autoconf.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake@xxxxxxxxxx    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux