On Wednesday 07 December 2011 14:10:27 Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> C++ compilers do not get these definition from stdint.h unless > >> __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is defined, the macros are in C99 and later, but > >> were not in the C++ standard of the day (I don't know if they're in > >> later C++ standards), so aren't defined for C++ compilers by > >> default. > > > > I still don't understand the details of the autoconf problem (and I > > still think that something is fishy), but defining this macro works > > just fine :-) > > Clearly, depending on an implementation-dependent macro is not > suitable for portable software. i thought __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS was part of the spec and thus not "implementation dependent" ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
