Re: Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have also used WANT_FEATURE and NEED_FEATURE sometimes.

If the app sets WANT_FEATURE and configure says is it there already, we
do not define NEED_FEATURE.  If configure says it is not there, we
define NEED_FEATURE and then in this case we provide the feature.

H

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux