Ralf wrote: > * Harlan Stenn wrote on Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:04:09AM CEST: > > > > Not sure if this is a great idea or not, but the only other alternative > > I can think of is to modify the configure.ac in the subpackage, and I > > would rather not do that as it creates "extra work" when I go to upgrade > > the subpackage. > > But you are aware of the configure.gnu "trick"? See info Autoconf > Subdirectories for the semantics. I'll check that out, thanks. > The trick is: you adjust the flags in subpkg/configure.gnu, then call > subpkg/configure with them. The subpkg/configure.gnu file might > actually belong to the toplevel package. A hack, but fairly easy. In the srcdir? How would that work for distcheck, which, as I recall, uses a read-only srcdir to simulate building from read-only media. But I'll read up on it anyway, to see if configure.gnu can be put in the build-dir before running srcdir/configure . > I like the idea of a more flexible AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS replacement, but > the suggested API does not really look appropriate yet, with all the > finer details of precious variables, (non-)shared config.cache handling > and so on still needing sane and precise semantics. Understood and agreed - thanks! H _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf