[ Cross post; Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To set. Please followup to the automake list only, to avoid excessive spammage. Thank you. ] Hello everyone, I've been advertising debbugs before, I think we should be a good example. So, two proposals: 1) Autoconf and Libtool should also use debbugs. bug-automake has switched a few months ago, and I find it helpful to avoid losing reports. Given that we never have enough time on our hands, it becomes more important to not lose track. See http://debbugs.gnu.org/ and linked pages for details. 2) Autotools should have a FAQ document. Not of the sort of the FAQ chapter that answers seven random questions and that has a 1 year+ latency until it is updated, but one that answers both totally-newbie kinds of questions that get asked over and over again, or cross-tool bug questions like the infamous libtool echo problem (which was due to an incompatible m4sugar change). A document that, ideally, eventually obsoletes many of the third-party "here's how autotools work, in quick" kinds of pages. See e.g., this most recent thread which made the need so clear again: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.patches/5672 For (2) I'd suggest a wiki if we GNU the infrastructure, but something like a new page http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/Autotools-FAQ.html would certainly be good. (And yes, I've been arguing against wikis in the past. I was wrong. Sue me.) Now, I have very little spare time on my hands. Any volunteers on managing such a document? Any people interested in contributing answers or even only questions? I wouldn't mind handing out commit privs to any of the regulars on these lists. Thanks for feedback, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf