Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:59:39PM CEST: > I'm already liking this, just from the description. Do we need to > teach autoconf to trace some new macros? I guess so (although I haven't looked at the patch at all yet). Shouldn't hurt to add these: _AM_AUTOCONF_VERSION _AM_ACLOCAL_FLAGS _AM_EXTRA_ACLOCAL_FLAGS AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR AM_EXTRA_RECURSIVE_TARGETS > I'd really like to get > autoconf 2.68.1 out the door this week with additional regression > fixes that have been reported, and I'm wondering whether adding a > few additional automake macros to trace during autoreconf are worth > adding in that release. You might want to consider just disabling the SIGPIPE test in autotest.at (lines 1603 until AT_CLEANUP). The test is broken, and more false positives are not helpful. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
