On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Reuben Hawkins <reubenhwk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:40 PM, NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hello Reuben, >>> >>> * Reuben Hawkins wrote on Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:00:02PM CEST: >>>> > Now, if you are still interested in contributing, and maybe in perl >>>> > rather than C, then I will send you the details off-list. >>> >>>> Yes, I'm interested in contributing, but not in Perl. It'll have to >>>> be C code. I'll check back with you in a few weeks when I feel the >>>> code is ready. >>> >>> Adding tool in a compiled language for this purpose doesn't make a lot >>> of sense for Autotools; it would needlessly complicate things, and >>> probably make the code size a lot bigger. If you don't want to >>> reconsider this, we can still profit from your prototype implementation >>> by looking at it and translating it (though I don't think I've ever >>> translated from C to Perl before ;-) >>> >>> But maybe one of the other maintainers likes this idea better ... >> >> UML..... >> > > So it seem to be working. amgen now scans the source and headers it > finds to come up with a reasonable include path. Anyone interested > can get the source here... > > git://gitorious.org/amgen/amgen.git > > The only thing I left out was to recursively scan the included headers > to flesh out the include path (maybe I'll get to that sometime). > I guess I should add I haven't run it through valgrind lately, but I plan to later..so there may be some leaks. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
