* Chris Stankevitz wrote on Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:50:00PM CEST: > --- On Tue, 7/20/10, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Please post 'make' and 'make -j1' output that shows this > > difference, > > Attached. Thanks. Even with your problem solved in the meantime, I would like to know whether there is a bug in Automake to be fixed. I cannot reproduce the issue with the information you provided yet. Which make version are you using? Maybe handling of $* changed between versions, and that causes the issues. Can you send (off-list, gzip'ed) the Makefile that causes the failure? I assume you are not using subdir-objects? (I think your make output already shows that.) > > Which Automake version are you using? > > SimLib/Expression$ automake --version > automake (GNU automake) 1.10.1 Please update to at least 1.10.3, preferably 1.11.1, in order to avoid a security-related issue with 'make dist'. > > IIUC then the BUILT_SOURCES are to be distributed, right? If yes, > > they should rather be in MAINTAINERCLEANFILES than in CLEANFILES, > > and if no, they should rather be built in the build tree not the > > source tree, so that read-only source trees can work. If that is > > possible with antlr, that is. > > I understand. I have the freedom to place them wherever I choose. I > chose $(srcdir) because I thought it would simplify the Makefile.am. > It will be a good exercise for me to move the files to the builddir > and see what issues come up. Well, 'make distcheck' should be able to tell you whether what you chose works with a read-only source tree. > > > $(srcdir)/TCExpressionLexer.hpp: $(srcdir)/TCExpressionLexer.cpp [...] > > Why are these dependencies necessary? > > I am following this pattern: > http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/Multiple-Outputs.html OK, that looks sane. Thanks, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
