Rainer wrote: > Calling a program arm-unknown-linux-gcc isn't particularly > useful. Especially if there are two arm-unknown-linux-gcc's which are > quite different, each of them needed for a particular > cross-compilation environment on the same machine. Have you seen any of my postings to this list about my 'cvo' script? What you describe is exactly why I wrote it, and if one really has multiple cpu-vendor-os-gcc programs that do different things, I'd put them in different subdirectories so it was clear from their path what their overall function was. H _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf