On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This has been done recently, for many cache variables. I failed to see
this message at that time (wrong Subject ;-) so didn't list you as bug
reporter.
attached is a tiny patch correcting a small typo in the heading for this new
index.
Hi Ralf,
here now another patch correcting the description for ac_cv_search_FUNC.
Regards
Peter Breitenlohner <peb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From d1e598832788f8b95068fb5f61e50fc297e8eff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Breitenlohner <peb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:19:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] description of ac_cv_search_FUNC
Signed-off-by: Peter Breitenlohner <peb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
doc/autoconf.texi | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi
index d5c001d..4685972 100644
--- a/doc/autoconf.texi
+++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
@@ -4428,7 +4428,8 @@ that @var{function} is present, because linking the test program
always fails with unresolved symbols.
The result of this test is cached in the
-@code{ac_cv_search_@var{function}} variable as @samp{no}, if no library
+@code{ac_cv_search_@var{function}} variable as @samp{none required} if
+@var{function} is already available, as @samp{no} if no library
containing @var{function} was found, otherwise as the
@option{-l@var{library}} option that needs to be added to @code{LIBS}.
@end defmac
--
1.6.4
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
