Re: [autoconf] checking automake version in configure.ac

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/6/2009 1:45 AM:
>>> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.11])
>>
>> yes, but...
>>
>>> This way, running an insufficient automake on your source files will
>>> error out.
>>
>> ... I don't want that behavior. I just want to add a feature, not to
>> forbid a user to rebuild the files.
> Your consideration doesn't make sense.
> 
> If your package requires a minimum version of automake, then your
> package can't be rebuilt without a sufficient version of automake,
> therefore the user must be stopped running his automake.

The desired behavior TOTALLY makes sense (although this is an automake
question, not an autoconf question) - an example is the use of color-tests
when available, with a clean fallback to no color-tests if an older
automake was sufficient for everything else.  See this thread on the
automake list for the same question, and the answer given by the maintainer:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2009-08/msg00035.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2009-08/msg00040.html

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@xxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrLMMsACgkQ84KuGfSFAYB0iwCeMvx6wdGc3BDm7mUGQ4dwGE+/
054An3wYsXGwULMIy7LToFv0IJrem1Kr
=xYCX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux