On Wednesday 09 September 2009 18:12:02 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > And yes, it is perfectly possible to have subpackages that do not > use Automake, or do not use Autoconf either. Their configure > scripts merely have to conform to what the GNU Coding Standards > say, and their makefiles too. Which is probably unfortunate, from the OP's perspective, because... On Wednesday 09 September 2009 16:02:58 Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > the zlib project does not use Autoconf or Automake. It > only pretends to look like a project which uses Autoconf or > Automake using a hand-written configure and Makefile.in which only > works completely under Linux. ...and the resemblance is in name only; beyond that, there isn't even a superficial likeness -- certainly in no way GCS conformant. -- Regards, Keith. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
