Thomas Dickey <dickey@xxxxxxx> writes: > more than one text-editor (you've listed two) does syntax-highlighting > for autoconf scripts, is scriptable, and can run subprocesses (emacs and > vim aren't IDEs, however - though there are _probably_ scripts for each > which do specific subtasks). I think the point is that "IDE" is hard to define. As I noted in my previous message, you're going to have a hard time naming an IDE feature that Emacs doesn't have. (It has an integrated source-code debugger, for instance.) It just doesn't put them together and present them in the way that most IDEs on, say, Windows would. -- Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
