Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 06 April 2009 22:25:12 Eric Blake wrote:
> Now for a question - right now, m4_default([$1], [$2]) is a nice shorthand
> for m4_ifval([$1], [$1], [$2]); is there any reason to create a shorthand
> for m4_ifnblank([$1], [$1], [$2]) that likewise only needs two arguments?
>  And if so, what to call it?

m4_default_blank([$1], [$2]) seems like a logical extension
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux