Re: [CFT] Shell functionization patch (if you don't know what that means, it's faster Autoconf and leaner configure scripts)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> What do you think?

Agreed on everything.

BTW, I think it's best for your sanity if you wait for the 12 separate
patches. :-)  This is just a call for test; the basic idea won't change
even if the implementation details of the shell functions (and not of
the calls) change, so it is safe to do it relatively early.

I'm travelling next week; when the AC_*_FN stuff and the zsh problems
are sorted out (maybe you can do that?), I'll submit the final patch
(using AC_REQUIRE_SHELL_FN).

Paolo


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux