On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 18:23 -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > I don't see why you keep mentioning cross-compiling. The problem is not > specific to cross compilation at all, it affects native use as well. Thank you, Brian, I have sent your message to the macro author, so now it is really easy for him to fix it for others as well. Regarding cross compilation, I have understood where the problem is and you are certainly right. Anyway, don't you think that the usability of AC_CHECK_LIB in the current form (not allowing inclusion of headers nor the precise specification of the function call) is quite low because of this calling convention issue? Don't you, autoconf guys, plan something more complex, but more robust and allowing checking for methods in C++? Regards, Matěj _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
