Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Eric Blake wrote:

Any objections to making AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete (with the recommendation of
replacing RETSIGTYPE with void in old code), since even C89 requires signal
handlers to return void?

Why are you interested in making this change? Is the macro causing problems? Try as we might, we can't change history and so this macro may be useful on many systems which are still in use.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/



_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux