Hello! On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Thomas Schwinge wrote on Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:36:50AM CEST: > > Is it possible to have the case handled where multiple ``--with-foo'' > > arguments are given? Currently the last one wins, it seems. > > > > What I'd like to support is ``--with-module=this > > --with-module=another_one ...''. Is this possible? > > No, unfortunately not; the possibility to override earlier command line > arguments is pretty helpful in some cases. You can use > --with-module=foo,bar,baz That would be an option, but I also need to pass additional information per module, à la ``--with-module=FILE,PRIORITY,SHARE,COMMAND LINE''. > or > --with-foo-module --with-bar-module... The ``foo'', ``bar'' parts aren't preassigned, everything is possible. Also the number of modules isn't limited (in theory). > If those modules describe parts of your package, then you should be > using --enable/--disable instead, no? They don't: they're external files to be embedded into a library. Regards, Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
