Re: just one of a million reasons why autoconf is a worthless piece of shit (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 15:37 +0100, Dirk wrote:
> I HAVE written something that works better than autoconf... in the
> real world... that requires only a installed C compiler... and is so
> easy it makes autoconf look like a project whose purpose is to harm
> open source development...

Hah!  Good one.  For a minute there I thought you might actually be
serious.  I know, crazy right?  You really got me on that one.  You kind
of overplayed it with the attachment, though: once I looked at the
contents it was soooo obvious that it was a big joke.  Next time either
do something more believable, or else just don't send anything at all:
people won't see through it so quickly.  Nevertheless, I needed a good
laugh, and you provided it so thanks for that.

Cheers!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul D. Smith <psmith@xxxxxxx>          Find some GNU make tips at:
 http://www.gnu.org                      http://make.mad-scientist.us
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux