Re: AS_CASE vs case/esac

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/13/08, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> wrote:
> * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:29:41AM CET:
> > On 3/13/08, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Please let this be productive and name them, so that can be fixed.
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be easier to write a script that compares the list of
> > obsolete macros in the autoconf manual with the macros that autoscan
> > handles?
>
> I think you are looking at a different manual version than your autoscan
> version.  At least the current autoscan recommends none of these macros
> any more AFAICS, and at a glance I could not find any others either.

$ autoscan --version
autoscan (GNU Autoconf) 2.61
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software.  You may redistribute copies of it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.


..and using this manual --
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html

> > Also, the macro AC_TYPE_SIGNAL comes up in the library checking
> > section, not the type checking section.
>
> Hmm, that looks like a bug...
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux