Christopher Hulbert <cchgroupmail <at> gmail.com> writes: > > According to Christopher Hulbert on 2/22/2008 2:18 PM: > > > > | I'm looking into converting some existing test methods to use > > | autotest. In doing so I ran into a problem that autom4te complained > > | AT_line was undefined. > > > > You invoked AT_CHECK outside of a AT_SETUP/AT_CLEANUP pair. Hmm, maybe it > > would be nicer to make AT_CHECK issue a nicer warning if users make this > > mistake. But for now, I'll just do a documentation patch: > > Thanks. I can't believe I missed that! FYI - Since just documenting the issue was the lazy way out, I've now submitted a code patch that makes this scenario much nicer for detection (ie. the error message states "AT_CHECK: missing AT_SETUP detected" and no longer mentions the cryptic AT_line): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches/5385 -- Eric Blake _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
