Eric Blake wrote: > ./configure --enable-fhs --docdir=$HOME/doc I think you could argue that this should be --with-fhs, or at least not --enable-fhs. The GCS says: > No ?--enable? option should ever cause one feature to replace > another. No ?--enable? option should ever substitute one useful > behavior for another useful behavior. The only proper use for > --enable? is for questions of whether to build part of the program > or exclude it. Actually, if you take the GCS as written there should be no option for this, the user should simply use the standard existing methods: > You will note that the categories ?--with-? and ?--enable-? are > narrow: they do not provide a place for any sort of option you might > think of. That is deliberate. We want to limit the possible > configuration options in GNU software. We do not want GNU programs > to have idiosyncratic configuration options. So, I dunno. It just seems to me personally that --with-fhs fits a little better. Brian _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
